Businesses With the Highest Failure Rates: Why You Should Think Twice Before Investing

Top 10 Businesses with Highest Failure Rates Exposed

Businesses With the Highest Failure Rates: Why You Should Think Twice Before Investing

Every year, thousands of eager entrepreneurs pour their savings, time, and energy into new ventures. Yet, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, roughly 23% of new businesses do not survive their first year. That number climbs to around 48% by the five-year mark and reaches an alarming 65% after a decade. These are not small figures. They represent real people who risked real money — and lost.

So, which industries carry the greatest risk? Moreover, why do some sectors consistently eat up investor capital with little to show for it? This guide examines the businesses with the highest failure rates in detail. It also explains the structural and market forces that drive those failures. Whether you are a first-time investor or a seasoned entrepreneur, understanding this landscape could save you a fortune.

Furthermore, this article goes beyond simply listing risky industries. It digs into why each sector fails, what warning signs investors often miss, and what the data actually says about small business survival rates across different timeframes. Read on, because the insights here may fundamentally reshape how you think about business risk.

Understanding Business Failure: The Big Picture

Before diving into specific sectors, it helps to understand what drives business failure at a macro level. Researchers and economists have identified several recurring culprits. According to LendingTree’s analysis of BLS data, the leading causes include inadequate financial planning, poor market research, weak management, and ineffective marketing strategies.

Additionally, external factors play a large role. Economic downturns, rising interest rates, supply chain disruptions, and shifting consumer behaviour can all devastate businesses that lack sufficient reserves. Consequently, industries that are especially sensitive to these pressures tend to show the highest failure rates over time.

It is also worth noting that geography matters. Data from Vena Solutions shows that Washington state sees a one-year failure rate of 40.8%, while California sits at just 18.5%. Meanwhile, Montana and Minnesota consistently show the lowest five- and ten-year failure rates in the country. Therefore, even within a single industry, location can be a decisive factor.

TimeframeBusiness Failure RateBusinesses Still Operating
After 1 Year~23.2%~76.8%
After 5 Years~48%~52%
After 10 Years~65.3%~34.7%

1. The Information and Technology Sector: Fast-Paced and Brutally Competitive

Perhaps surprisingly to some, the information industry has the highest one-year failure rate of any sector at 25.8%. Its five-year failure rate stands at 54.6%. That means more than half of all new information businesses collapse within five years of opening.

Why does this happen? The information sector covers an enormous range of businesses — publishing, data processing, broadcasting, software development, and streaming platforms. All of these fields share one key trait: they evolve at a ferocious pace. A product that feels cutting-edge today can feel obsolete within 18 months. Companies that fail to keep up simply get left behind.

Technology Startups and App Development

Within the information sector, technology startups and app development companies face an especially brutal environment. Approximately 90% of startups fail overall, and a large proportion of those are tech ventures. The reasons are well-documented: burn rates that outpace revenue, intense competition from established players, and an often-misunderstood customer base.

Moreover, app development carries unique financial pressures. Building a minimum viable product can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Yet, the App Store and Google Play are both saturated with millions of competing apps. Therefore, even a technically solid product can vanish without a trace if its developers have not budgeted adequately for user acquisition and marketing.

Furthermore, investor funding is not a safety net. Many tech founders mistake a Series A raise for proof of long-term viability. In reality, venture capital comes with high-growth expectations that many startups simply cannot meet. When those expectations go unmet, investors pull back, cash dries up, and the business collapses.

2. The Restaurant Industry: High Passion, Higher Failure

Few sectors carry as much emotional weight as the restaurant business. People dream of running their own dining establishment, but the restaurant failure rate is sobering. Up to 90% of independent restaurants fail within the first year, while roughly 60% close within three years. These numbers vary by source, but the consensus is clear: restaurants are among the riskiest business investments you can make.

Starting a restaurant requires enormous upfront capital. Equipment, lease deposits, interior fit-outs, staffing, licensing, and food inventory all demand funding before a single plate is served. As a result, even well-funded restaurants can find themselves in financial trouble within months if customer traffic falls short of projections.

Why Independent Restaurants Struggle

According to Yahoo Finance’s analysis, restaurant owners frequently underestimate operational complexity. Food cost management, staff turnover, seasonal demand swings, and supplier relationships all require significant management skill. Many first-time restaurant owners are passionate cooks or hospitality lovers — but passion does not automatically translate into business acumen.

Additionally, the net margin in the restaurant and dining industry sits at just 6.27% as of 2022. Thin margins mean there is very little room for error. One bad month, one failed health inspection, or one damaging online review can be enough to push a fragile business into the red. Therefore, investors and aspiring owners must approach this sector with eyes wide open.

It is also worth considering the competitive landscape. In most urban areas, restaurant density is extremely high. New openings compete not only with neighbouring restaurants but also with delivery apps and ghost kitchen operators that carry far lower overhead costs. Consequently, the traditional sit-down restaurant model is under structural pressure that shows no sign of easing.

IndustryNet Margin (2022)Primary Risk Factor
Restaurant/Dining6.27%High overhead, thin margins, intense competition
Retail Trade3.14%E-commerce disruption, low margins
Auto Parts2.56%Supply chain volatility, online alternatives
Software (Internet)-13.33%Burn rate, market saturation
ConstructionVariableMaterial costs, economic sensitivity

3. Retail Trade: Caught Between E-Commerce and Obsolescence

Retail trade has the highest overall failure rate when measured by net margin. At just 3.14%, there is almost no cushion for business owners operating in this space. Traditional brick-and-mortar retailers face an increasingly inhospitable environment, squeezed on one side by Amazon and e-commerce giants and on the other by rising commercial rents and shifting consumer habits.

The fundamental problem is structural. Consumers have more choices than ever before. They can compare prices in seconds, order from global suppliers, and receive deliveries within 24 hours. Against that backdrop, a small independent retailer selling mid-range goods at standard prices simply struggles to compete. Unless a retailer offers something genuinely distinctive — exceptional service, rare products, or a unique shopping experience — the economics simply do not work in their favour.

Fashion Boutiques and Speciality Retail

Fashion retail deserves special mention. Independent clothing boutiques face particularly brutal failure rates. Many close within the first five years of operation, driven by the cyclical nature of fashion, high inventory costs, and the difficulty of building a loyal customer base from scratch.

Furthermore, the rise of fast fashion brands and ultra-fast online retailers like SHEIN and Temu has placed enormous price pressure on smaller players. These platforms produce and sell clothing at prices that small boutiques simply cannot match. Therefore, any investor considering a fashion retail venture should think carefully about differentiation before committing capital.

Market saturation is another key issue. Social commerce on platforms like Instagram and TikTok has lowered the barrier to entry for fashion retail dramatically. While that sounds like an opportunity, it also means the market is flooded with competitors. Cutting through that noise requires substantial marketing spend, which further erodes already slim margins.

4. Construction: Capital-Intensive and Economically Sensitive

The construction industry sees failure rates that exceed 50% within the first five years, particularly for small contractors. According to LendingTree, construction consistently ranks among the highest-failure sectors across multiple timeframes. The reasons are largely structural and tied to broader economic conditions.

Running a small construction company requires constant juggling: managing labour costs, sourcing materials at competitive prices, winning contracts, and maintaining cash flow between project completions. Any disruption to one of those variables can cascade quickly. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, supply chain disruptions caused material costs to soar, squeezing contractors who had already quoted fixed-price contracts to clients.

Why Small Contractors Face Disproportionate Risk

Large construction firms have the capital reserves, legal departments, and procurement power to weather economic shocks. Small contractors do not. According to National Business Capital, construction saw a 53% failure rate in 2019, making it one of the most dangerous sectors for small business owners. Moreover, the industry is heavily cyclical: when the housing market slows or commercial development dries up, small contractors have very little alternative revenue to fall back on.

Additionally, licensing requirements, insurance costs, and compliance obligations add significant overhead. Many small construction businesses underestimate these costs when starting. As a result, they find themselves operating at a loss before they ever complete their first major project.

That said, some sub-sectors within construction show greater resilience. Landscaping, renovation work, and interior decorating tend to carry lower startup costs and more predictable demand. Consequently, investors who are determined to enter construction should consider these lower-risk niches before tackling general contracting.

5. E-Commerce Startups: The Illusion of Low Barriers

Many aspiring entrepreneurs are drawn to e-commerce because the barriers to entry appear low. You can set up a Shopify store in an afternoon. You can source products through Alibaba without ever touching inventory. And you can reach a global audience from your laptop. However, the failure rate for general e-commerce startups exceeds 90% — and that figure reveals just how deceptive the apparent simplicity really is.

The core challenge is customer acquisition. Without a substantial marketing budget, an e-commerce store is essentially invisible. Paid advertising on Google and Meta has become increasingly expensive as competition intensifies. Organic search traffic takes months or even years to build. Meanwhile, the store’s owner is still paying for hosting, software subscriptions, and potentially warehousing costs — all before making a single sale.

Market Saturation and the Amazon Problem

Beyond the marketing challenge, e-commerce entrepreneurs must contend with Amazon’s dominance. Consumers have been conditioned to expect Prime-level shipping speeds, effortless returns, and rock-bottom prices. Meeting those expectations as an independent operator is nearly impossible without significant infrastructure investment.

Niche e-commerce businesses tend to fare better. Stores that target highly specific audiences — hobbyists, collectors, professionals in specialised fields — can build loyal customer bases that are less sensitive to price competition. However, even niche players must still invest heavily in SEO, content marketing, and customer retention to remain viable. Therefore, the idea that e-commerce is a cheap and easy business model is, at best, a dangerous oversimplification.

Furthermore, supply chain issues can cripple e-commerce ventures unexpectedly. Dropshipping businesses in particular face serious risks: if a supplier runs out of stock, ships slowly, or delivers poor-quality goods, the e-commerce operator bears the reputational damage. These risks are often invisible during the planning stage, which is why so many new online businesses fail within their first 12 months.

6. Multi-Level Marketing: The Business Model That Fails Almost Everyone

It would be irresponsible to discuss high-failure-rate businesses without addressing multi-level marketing, or MLM. According to multiple studies, over 99% of people who join MLM schemes lose money. That is not a typo — the vast majority of MLM participants end up financially worse off than when they started.

The structure of MLM businesses is fundamentally problematic from an investment perspective. Revenue depends primarily on recruiting new participants rather than selling products to end consumers. As a result, the business model resembles a pyramid: those at the top profit from the fees and purchases of those below, while the overwhelming majority at the base earn little to nothing.

Why MLM Remains Popular Despite Dismal Returns

Despite damning statistics, MLM companies continue to attract recruits. Their marketing is often highly persuasive, emphasising flexibility, financial freedom, and community. Social media amplifies success stories from the tiny minority who do profit, creating a misleading impression of typical results.

Moreover, many MLM companies operate in emotionally resonant categories — wellness products, cosmetics, dietary supplements — which makes it easy to conflate personal enthusiasm for a product with business viability. However, enthusiasm does not pay bills. The Federal Trade Commission has published guidelines on evaluating MLM income claims, and their findings consistently show that income disclosures paint a bleak picture for the average participant.

Therefore, anyone approached with an MLM opportunity should scrutinise the income disclosure statement carefully before joining. If the median annual income is in the hundreds of dollars — as it frequently is — the opportunity is not a business. It is, at best, an expensive hobby.

7. Real Estate Flipping: Glamourised on Television, Brutal in Reality

Property flipping has been glamorised by reality television for years. Shows make it look straightforward: buy a distressed property, renovate it, and sell for a handsome profit. But real estate investment reality is far more complicated — especially during economic downturns.

Flipping requires access to capital at competitive rates. It also demands accurate renovation cost estimates, a reliable network of contractors, and a solid read on local market conditions. All three are genuinely difficult to achieve, particularly for first-time flippers. Moreover, interest rates have a profound impact on this business model: higher borrowing costs eat directly into margins, and a rising rate environment can turn a seemingly profitable deal into a money-losing exercise.

Timing the Market Is Harder Than It Looks

The single biggest risk in property flipping is market timing. During bull markets, even moderately skilled flippers can turn a profit. However, when markets correct, flippers who purchased at peak prices can find themselves holding assets worth less than they paid — plus renovation costs on top. During the 2008 financial crisis, thousands of property investors were wiped out precisely this way.

Additionally, speculative real estate investing is capital-intensive and illiquid. Unlike a stock or an ETF, a property cannot be sold at the click of a button. If the market turns and you need to exit, you may be stuck holding the asset for months while carrying costs accumulate. Therefore, property flipping should be considered a high-risk strategy, not a reliable income source.

8. Personal Services: Salons, Spas, and Gyms

The personal services sector — encompassing hair salons, beauty spas, nail studios, and fitness centres — presents an interesting case study in business failure. These businesses are often started by talented practitioners who are excellent at their craft but lack the business skills to run a sustainable operation. As a result, over 50% of personal service businesses fail within the first five years, according to LinkedIn industry data.

The economics are tricky. Personal services businesses are labour-intensive, which means the majority of revenue goes straight to payroll. Rent for high-street or mall locations adds another high cost. Meanwhile, pricing is constrained by local competition and consumer expectations. Therefore, the path to profitability requires either high volume, premium pricing, or both — and both demand strong marketing and an exceptional customer experience.

The Gym and Fitness Industry

Gyms and fitness studios deserve special mention within this category. The fitness industry is notoriously difficult to break into. Large gym chains benefit from economies of scale that small operators simply cannot match. Equipment costs are substantial, and maintenance adds ongoing expense. Furthermore, member retention is a persistent challenge: research consistently shows that the majority of gym members who sign up in January have stopped attending by March.

Boutique fitness studios — yoga, Pilates, spin classes — fared particularly badly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many closed permanently after months of forced closure. Although the sector recovered partially, the structural challenges remain. Competition from at-home workout platforms like Peloton and YouTube fitness channels has permanently altered the competitive landscape for small fitness businesses.

9. Arts, Entertainment, and Independent Media

Building a profitable business in arts and entertainment is, frankly, extraordinarily difficult. Independent music labels, small film production companies, and independent gaming studios all face extremely high failure rates. The combination of high production costs, unpredictable consumer tastes, and fierce competition from well-funded incumbents creates a perfect storm for failure.

Streaming platforms have fundamentally disrupted how arts and entertainment businesses generate revenue. Musicians earn fractions of a penny per stream. Independent filmmakers compete with Netflix budgets that dwarf what a small production company can assemble. As a result, the financial model for independent creative ventures relies heavily on live events, merchandise, and licensing — all of which require substantial additional investment and expertise to execute well.

Why Passion Does Not Equal Profit

One of the most important lessons from studying the arts and entertainment sector is that passion and talent, while necessary, are not sufficient conditions for business success. Many highly talented creators build wonderful work that never finds a sustainable audience. This is not a failure of creativity — it is a failure of business strategy and distribution.

Successful independent creators increasingly think like media companies. They diversify revenue streams, invest in community building, and treat their audience as a business asset rather than a passive recipient of their work. Even so, the vast majority do not generate income that replaces a salaried job. Therefore, investing in arts and entertainment ventures should be treated as a high-risk, potentially zero-return proposition unless there is a clearly articulated path to monetisation.

10. Independent Car Dealers: Cyclical and Margin-Thin

Independent used car dealerships round out the list of the highest-failure-rate businesses. Their failure rate fluctuates with the broader economy, but during downturns — like the 2008 crisis or the COVID-era microchip shortage — independent dealers suffer disproportionately. Franchise dealers have manufacturer support, floor plan financing, and service revenue to fall back on. Independent dealers have none of those advantages.

Additionally, the used car market has been transformed by digital platforms like CarMax, Carvana, and AutoTrader. These platforms bring price transparency that compresses margins for traditional dealers. Furthermore, consumers can now access vehicle history reports, competitive pricing data, and financing options online — reducing their dependence on dealership staff and eroding the information advantage that dealers once held.

Key Warning Signs That a Business Is High-Risk

Before committing capital to any business venture, investors and entrepreneurs should watch for specific warning signs. Understanding these red flags can help avoid industries or specific businesses that are likely to fail. Consider the following indicators carefully.

Warning SignWhat It IndicatesHigh-Risk Sectors Affected
Net margin below 5%Little buffer for unexpected costsRetail, restaurants, auto parts
High customer acquisition costsUnsustainable growth modelE-commerce, tech startups
Dependence on a single supplierSupply chain vulnerabilityConstruction, retail, e-commerce
Revenue tied to economic cyclesRecession sensitivityReal estate, construction, and car dealers
No clear differentiationCommodity pricing pressureRetail, personal services, restaurants
High staff turnoverOperational instability, cultural issuesRestaurants, gyms, and personal services
Founder-dependent operationsNo scalable systems in placeArts, personal services, and independent retail

What the Data Says About Industries That Survive

It is worth spending a moment on the opposite side of the equation. While the focus here has been on high-failure industries, understanding what makes certain sectors more resilient can inform smarter investment decisions. According to National Business Capital, healthcare and social services businesses show the highest survival rates, with just 19.2% failing within the first year and 60% still operating after five years.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting also demonstrate relative resilience. According to LendingTree, this sector has the lowest five-year failure rate at 34.2% and the lowest ten-year failure rate at 46.2%. While these are not glamorous industries, their fundamental demand characteristics — people need food and natural resources — provide a floor that more discretionary sectors simply do not have.

Furthermore, failure rates are not destiny. A 2019 study cited by National Business Capital found that founders whose first ventures fail have a 20% higher chance of success in subsequent businesses. Experience, even painful experience, is genuinely educational. That is an important counterweight to the sobering statistics presented throughout this article.

Strategies to Reduce Your Risk Before Investing

If you are considering investing in or starting a business in one of these high-risk sectors, several strategies can meaningfully reduce your exposure. These are not guarantees of success. However, they are well-supported by both data and practitioner experience.

First, conduct thorough market research before committing any capital. Many businesses fail not because the idea is bad but because the founder assumed demand that did not materialise. Use tools likeGoogle Trends, Statista, and industry reports to validate assumptions before spending a dollar.

Second, build a detailed financial model that accounts for worst-case scenarios. What happens if revenue is 30% below projections in the first year? Can the business survive six months of near-zero income? Stress-testing your financials before launch is one of the most valuable exercises a founder or investor can undertake. Tools like SCORE’s financial templates can help with this process.

Third, seek mentorship from people who have operated businesses in your target industry. Abstract business advice has limited value compared to hard-won sector-specific experience. Organisations likeSCORE, Small Business Development Centres, and industry associations can connect you with experienced mentors at little or no cost.

Fourth, consider starting smaller than you think you need to. Many business failures stem from over-investment at the outset — leasing too much space, hiring too many staff, or investing in expensive equipment before demand is proven. Starting lean and scaling only when the market validates your model is a far safer approach than betting everything on a launch day.

Fifth, diversify wherever possible. Businesses that depend entirely on a single revenue stream, a single client, or a single product are inherently fragile. Building redundancy into your business model from the beginning adds resilience that may prove invaluable when unexpected challenges arise.

The Role of Economic Conditions in Business Survival

No analysis of business failure rates would be complete without acknowledging the role of macroeconomic conditions. The businesses most at risk in a downturn are those with high fixed costs, low cash reserves, and demand that is sensitive to consumer confidence. Restaurants, retailers, and gyms all fit this profile precisely.

Conversely, businesses with counter-cyclical demand — discount retailers, repair services, healthcare, and basic food production — tend to hold up relatively well during recessions. This is not because they are immune to economic pressure, but because their underlying demand does not collapse when consumer spending tightens.

Interest rate environments also matter enormously. When borrowing is cheap, businesses can absorb losses and fund growth with debt. When rates rise sharply — as they did between 2022 and 2024 — businesses carrying significant debt loads face rapidly escalating interest expenses. Real estate flippers, construction companies, and capital-intensive retailers are particularly exposed to this dynamic. Therefore, the macroeconomic backdrop should always inform your assessment of business risk.

Investor Considerations: Due Diligence in High-Risk Sectors

If you are an investor evaluating an opportunity in one of these high-risk sectors, your due diligence process needs to be proportionally rigorous. Standard questions about revenue and margins are necessary but not sufficient. You also need to assess the specific vulnerabilities that make these industries prone to failure.

For restaurant investments, request detailed unit economics: average spend per cover, table turns per service, food cost percentage, and labour cost as a proportion of revenue. Ask to see at least 12 months of trading data, not just the most recent period. Be sceptical of projections that assume smooth linear growth — restaurants are subject to sudden demand shocks that can materially alter their financial trajectory.

For tech startup investments, focus relentlessly oncustomer acquisition cost versus customer lifetime value relentlessly. If it costs more to acquire a customer than they will ever generate in revenue, the business model is not viable, regardless of how impressive the technology is. Many startups paper over this fundamental problem with growth metrics that look exciting but do not survive scrutiny.

For retail investments, examine the competitive moat carefully. What prevents a larger player from replicating what this business does? If the honest answer is ‘not much,’ that is a significant red flag. Genuine competitive advantages in retail are rare and precious — proprietary products, exclusive supplier relationships, and deeply loyal communities are the most durable.

Can High-Risk Businesses Still Succeed? Absolutely

It would be misleading to suggest that every restaurant, every tech startup, or every fashion boutique is doomed. Clearly, that is not the case — successful businesses exist in every one of these sectors. The point is not that success is impossible, but that it is significantly harder than it appears, and that the odds are stacked against the average entrant.

The businesses that beat the odds typically share several characteristics. They enter the market with a genuinely differentiated offering. They are led by founders with relevant prior experience. They are capitalised sufficiently to survive the inevitable slow periods that every new business faces. And they are relentlessly focused on customer feedback, using it to iterate and improve rapidly.

Additionally, timing matters. Entering a high-risk sector during a period of economic expansion is inherently safer than launching during a contraction. While no one can predict economic cycles perfectly, paying attention to leading indicators — consumer confidence, credit availability, and sector-specific trends — can help you choose a launch window that maximises your probability of survival.

Making Smarter Investment Decisions: A Framework

Rather than simply avoiding high-risk sectors entirely, consider applying a structured framework to evaluate any business opportunity. This approach helps you assess risk more objectively and identify whether the potential reward justifies the exposure.

Evaluation CriterionQuestions to AskRisk Level Indicator
Market size and growthIs the market growing or shrinking? What is the TAM?Shrinking market = High Risk
Competitive intensityHow many direct competitors exist? What are their margins?Crowded market = High Risk
Capital requirementsHow much capital is needed before breakeven?High capex = High Risk
Unit economicsIs CAC lower than LTV? What is the payback period?CAC > LTV = Fatal Risk
Founder experienceHas the team operated in this sector before?No experience = Elevated Risk
Cash runwayHow many months of operating costs are covered?Less than 12 months = High Risk
Regulatory environmentIs the sector subject to significant regulatory changes?High regulation = Variable Risk

The Psychological Traps That Lead Investors Astray

Understanding the statistics is only half the battle. Even investors who know the failure rates often proceed with high-risk ventures because of cognitive biases that distort their decision-making. Recognising these psychological traps is an important part of protecting your capital.

Optimism bias is perhaps the most dangerous. Almost every entrepreneur believes their restaurant, their app, or their boutique will be the one that beats the odds. This is psychologically understandable — you would not start a business if you thought you were going to fail. However, the data does not care about your confidence. Therefore, deliberately seeking out disconfirming evidence — reasons why your venture might fail — is one of the most valuable things you can do before investing.

Sunk cost fallacy is another trap that destroys investor capital. Once money has been committed, there is a powerful psychological tendency to throw good money after bad in an attempt to recover the initial investment. However, as any economist will tell you, sunk costs are irrelevant to future decisions. If the business fundamentals have not changed, additional investment will not change the outcome.

Finally, social proof can be misleading in entrepreneurship contexts. The fact that a friend or colleague is investing in something does not make it a good investment. Similarly, the fact that a sector is generating buzz does not mean that the underlying economics are attractive. Herd behaviour has driven countless investors into high-risk ventures that ultimately failed to deliver returns.

Final Thoughts: Know the Odds Before You Bet

The businesses covered in this article — from restaurants and tech startups to fashion boutiques and MLM schemes — all carry elevated failure rates for reasons that are structural, economic, and often psychological. Understanding why these sectors fail is not about being pessimistic. It is about being realistic.

Smart investors and entrepreneurs use failure data not to avoid all risk, but to price risk correctly. If you know that the information industry has a 54.6% five-year failure rate, you can factor that into your expected return calculations. If you know that restaurants fail at extremely high rates, you can either demand proportionally higher returns or simply focus your capital elsewhere.

Moreover, the data consistently show that preparation matters. Businesses that enter with thorough market research, realistic financial planning, relevant experience, and sufficient capital dramatically outperform those that launch on enthusiasm alone. Therefore, the most powerful thing any entrepreneur or investor can do is commit fully to preparation before committing capital.

The resources linked throughout this article — from LendingTree’s failure rate data to the FTC’s MLM guidance — provide a solid foundation for further research. Use them. The entrepreneurs who beat the odds do so because they understood the landscape clearly before they stepped into it.

Spend some time on your future. 

To deepen your understanding of today’s evolving financial landscape, we recommend exploring the following articles:

Navigating Financial Nihilism: Investment Plays for Inflated Assets
Funnel Autopsy: Diagnosing High Traffic and Near‑Zero Conversions
How to Tell If You’re a Finance Genius—or Quietly Headed for Trouble
Outdated Old-School Financial Advice: What to Ignore and What to Replace It With

Explore these articles to get a grasp on the new changes in the financial world.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing contained herein constitutes financial, legal, or investment advice. Business failure rates and statistics cited are based on third-party data sources and may not reflect current conditions. Past performance and historical failure rates do not guarantee future outcomes. Always consult a qualified financial adviser, accountant, or legal professional before making any investment or business decisions. The author and publisher accept no liability for actions taken based on the information presented in this article.

References

[1] U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, ‘Business Employment Dynamics,’ https://www.bls.gov/bdm/entrepreneurship/entrepreneurship.htm, accessed Feb. 2025.

[2] LendingTree, ‘Percentage of Businesses That Fail,’ https://www.lendingtree.com/business/small/failure-rate/, accessed Feb. 2025.

[3] Vena Solutions, ‘What Percentage of Businesses Fail? Averages by Time, Industry,’ https://www.venasolutions.com/blog/what-percentage-of-businesses-fail, accessed Feb. 2025.

[4] Yahoo Finance, ’10 Small Businesses That Have High Failure Rates,’ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/10-small-businesses-high-failure-110901896.html, accessed Feb. 2025.

[5] LinkedIn / The Job Helpers, ‘Top 10 Businesses with Highest Failure Rates,’ https://www.linkedin.com/posts/thejobhelpers_top-10-businesses-with-highest-failure-activity-7300590905466462208-5feJ, accessed Feb. 2025.

[6] National Business Capital, ‘2019 Small Business Failure Rate: Startup Statistics by Industry,’ https://www.nationalbusinesscapital.com/blog/2019-small-business-failure-rate-startup-statistics-industry/, accessed Feb. 2025.

[7] Federal Trade Commission, ‘Multi-Level Marketing Businesses and Pyramid Schemes,’ https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/multilevel-marketing, accessed Feb. 2025.

[8] SCORE, ‘Business Plan Template for a Startup Business,’ https://www.score.org/resource/business-plan-template-startup-business, accessed Feb. 2025.

[9] America’s SBDC, ‘Small Business Development Centres,’ https://americassbdc.org/, accessed Feb. 2025.

[10] Google Trends, https://trends.google.com/trends/, accessed Feb. 2025.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *